First, the subject of judges' professional ethics is judges. The professional ethics of judges is a branch of the legal professional ethics system. It takes judges as the binding object, and is obviously different from prosecutors' professional ethics and lawyers' professional ethics because of their neutral status, judicial duties and other special requirements.
Second, the object of judges' professional ethics is mainly the behavior of judges performing judicial duties. The basic duty of a judge is to try a case. Therefore, the scope of professional moral restraint of judges is mainly the judicial activities of judges. At the same time, because some non-professional activities of judges also affect the image of judges to a certain extent, some non-professional activities directly related to the professional image of judges should also be restricted by the professional ethics of judges.
Third, in addition to the specific norms of professional ethics, the concept of professional ethics of judges is also an important part of their professional ethics.
The essential characteristics of the judge profession are reflected in the judge's professional ethics, some of which can be directly expressed as codes of conduct and norms, while some conceptual requirements are difficult to specify, such as trial independence, judicial justice and so on. Although some specific norms can guarantee judicial independence and impartiality, it is more important for judges to firmly establish the judicial concept of independence and impartiality. And restrict your behavior all the time. Even the most detailed code of conduct cannot exhaust all forms of behavior, but noble professional ethics can enable judges to distinguish between right and wrong, good and evil at any time. First, the subject of judges' professional ethics is judges. The professional ethics of judges is a branch of the legal professional ethics system. It takes judges as the binding object, and is obviously different from prosecutors' professional ethics and lawyers' professional ethics because of their neutral status, judicial duties and other special requirements.
Second, the object of judges' professional ethics is mainly the behavior of judges performing judicial duties. The basic duty of a judge is to try a case. Therefore, the scope of professional moral restraint of judges is mainly the judicial activities of judges. At the same time, because some non-professional activities of judges also affect the image of judges to a certain extent, some non-professional activities directly related to the professional image of judges should also be restricted by the professional ethics of judges.
Third, in addition to the specific norms of professional ethics, the concept of professional ethics of judges is also an important part of their professional ethics.
The essential characteristics of the judge profession are reflected in the judge's professional ethics, some of which can be directly expressed as codes of conduct and norms, while some conceptual requirements are difficult to specify, such as trial independence, judicial justice and so on. Although some specific norms can guarantee judicial independence and impartiality, it is more important for judges to firmly establish the judicial concept of independence and impartiality. And restrict your behavior all the time. Even the most detailed code of conduct cannot exhaust all forms of behavior, but noble professional ethics can enable judges to distinguish between right and wrong, good and evil at any time. First, the subject of judges' professional ethics is judges. The professional ethics of judges is a branch of the legal professional ethics system. It takes judges as the binding object, and is obviously different from prosecutors' professional ethics and lawyers' professional ethics because of their neutral status, judicial duties and other special requirements.
Second, the object of judges' professional ethics is mainly the behavior of judges performing judicial duties. The basic duty of a judge is to try a case. Therefore, the scope of professional moral restraint of judges is mainly the judicial activities of judges. At the same time, because some non-professional activities of judges also affect the image of judges to a certain extent, some non-professional activities directly related to the professional image of judges should also be restricted by the professional ethics of judges.
Third, in addition to the specific norms of professional ethics, the concept of professional ethics of judges is also an important part of their professional ethics.
The essential characteristics of the judge profession are reflected in the judge's professional ethics, some of which can be directly expressed as codes of conduct and norms, while some conceptual requirements are difficult to specify, such as trial independence, judicial justice and so on. Although some specific norms can guarantee judicial independence and impartiality, it is more important for judges to firmly establish the judicial concept of independence and impartiality. And restrict your behavior all the time. Even the most detailed code of conduct cannot exhaust all forms of behavior, but noble professional ethics can enable judges to distinguish between right and wrong, good and evil at any time.
